Added: Klye Ries - Date: 16.12.2021 18:52 - Views: 44865 - Clicks: 4131
Studying sex differences seldom gets boring. For most of our evolutionary past, bigger men fended off rivals for female attention and out-competed other men to secure status and resources that made them useful contributors to a family.
These advantages offset the energetic costs and higher disease risk of building a bigger body. But what of other manly features? What use is masculine hairiness? Or those features that tend to distinguish male from female faces.
Like many other traits, from height to interest in the affairs of the sisters Kardashian, facial features differ between women and men, on average, but there is much overlap between the sexes. Women and men both rate female faces bearing typically feminine features as more attractive than female faces with more masculine combinations of traits.
So it would be reasonable to predict that lantern-jawed, Neanderthal-browed men at the far-masculine end of the facial distribution would be sought-after by women. But reality is far more varied and interesting. It seems that women vary in how attractive they find masculine faces.
Women at the fertile peak of their cycle favour more masculine faces, or at least less-feminine ones, than women not at the fertile peak or on the pill. Women who rate their own partners as highly masculine, or who describe their ideal partners as highly masculine, prefer more masculine faces in experiments.
And women contemplating once-off sex or infidelity are keener on masculine-looking men. The prevailing view in evolutionary psychology is that highly masculine men make great sperm donors but not necessarily awesome partners and fathers. First the downside: highly masculine men are less committed as fathers and partners, less cooperative, more sensation-seeking in outlook and more likely to seek short-term sexual encounters than less-masculine looking men.
While low-T, less-masculine guys might make better long-term partners, there might be benefits of a fleeting attraction, at peak fertility, to manly men if they are more likely to sire genetically well-endowed. As do women primed with images of body fluids, skin lesions and other cues of disease. Developing highly masculine features takes plenty of testosterone, an immunosuppressing hormone.
Which means only those with the best immune genes can afford to be taxed with high-T levels in puberty. Or so the story goes. This is one of those ideas with prurient appeal, but patchy evidence. Every link, from the attractiveness of masculine facial features to the immunosuppressive nature of testosterone to the claim that masculine-looking men have good immunity genes is contested.
Only with new kinds of evidence can this complex question be more rigorously tested. And such new evidence has emerged, in the form of a paper in Psychological Science by Anthony J. From an exhaustive suite of measures taken from photographs of teenaged identical and non-identical twins and their non-twin siblings, Lee dissected the extent to which variation in facial masculinity-femininity is due to genetic variation.
Interestingly, around half the variation in both male and female facial masculinity could be attributed to additive genetic variation. The extensive genetic variation in masculinity makes more plausible the idea that choosing to mate with a masculine man can result in more attractive offspring. But the genes that made a male face more masculine did not make it more attractive. Worse, these same genes made female faces more masculine and thus less attractive. Families that make manly-looking sons tend also to make masculine-looking daughters.
Overall, this paper deals a substantial blow to the idea that masculine men make good genetic sires. Of course, the genes that confer masculinity on both sons and daughters might have other positive effects, including but not limited to improved immunity.
That remains to be assessed, hopefully with the same kind of quantitative genetic evidence. The evidence that masculine faces predict other testosterone-dependent traits typically associated with men suggests the strong action of sexual selection, but the evidence that female mate choice drives that sexual selection is far from settled.
Perhaps masculine looks, like size, are more about alling to other men.
Some collaborators and I have shown that those countries where disease is rife and women prefer more masculine men are also characterised by high income inequality - a driver of man-on-man competition and violence.
Manly, competitive men might have been better providers and defenders throughout a history more violent and competitive that suburban life is today. Much about the variable preference for manliness and for bad boys remains to be explained. Much, I fear, might be inexplicable.
Or the FreeJahar teens who profess to love the alleged Boston Bomber. But none of it is boring. Disclosure: I have collaborated with Lee and Zietsch on studies of attractiveness unrelated to this new paper. Plymouth Contemporary — Plymouth, Devon. Edition: Available editions United Kingdom. Natural history of the present How evolution and ecology shape modern life. Eva Rinaldi, Wikimedia Commons Like many other traits, from height to interest in the affairs of the sisters Kardashian, facial features differ between women and men, on average, but there is much overlap between the sexes.
post December 3, The selfie, the tummy and the act of war: a dispatch from the battle over female attractiveness and sexuality. Next post February 1, Cooperation and conflict in sex, reproduction and family life.Masculine lookin for same
email: [email protected]ail.com - phone:(525) 565-7138 x 6786
Masculinity and femininity